The National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) has been a rite of passage for Nigerian graduates for decades. Created to foster national integration, unity, and civic responsibility, the scheme sends graduates to various parts of the country for a year of service. Yet in 2024, many are asking: Does NYSC still deliver what it promises?
Between rising insecurity, a tough economy, delayed allowances, and stories of exploitation, dissatisfaction with NYSC is growing. This article breaks down the advantages and disadvantages of the scheme, examines real costs and risks, and offers an evidence-based verdict about what Nigerian graduates might realistically expect: reform or scrapping?
The Benefits: What NYSC Still Offers
Although criticisms abound, NYSC continues to have features that many graduates and stakeholders hold dear. These benefits help explain why many argue for reform rather than complete abandonment.
-
National Integration and Unity
NYSC posts graduates to states other than their origin, promoting exposure to different ethnic groups, languages, and cultures. This helps build social cohesion, understanding, and sometimes lifelong networks beyond one’s home state. -
Requirement for Employment
Many government jobs, as well as some private sector roles, still require evidence of NYSC service (the certificate). Without it, graduates often cannot apply for certain roles, promotions, or opportunities. This requirement gives NYSC a kind of institutional leverage. -
Personal Growth and Maturity
For many young people fresh out of university, NYSC provides an experience of independence, self-reliance, and resilience. Being away from home, managing limited resources, adapting to new environments — these are soft skills graduates often gain. -
Socioeconomic Recognition
Completing NYSC is often seen in Nigeria as a marker of diligence, legitimacy, and commitment. In social settings (family, communities), having served confers respect and may open informal networks or connections.
The Costs & Dangers: Why Many Graduates Feel Frustrated
Despite its benefits, NYSC also imposes real costs — financial, emotional, and even physical. For many recent graduates, these costs increasingly seem to outweigh the benefits.
-
Insecurity of Postings
Many corps members are posted to states or regions with high levels of insecurity (kidnapping, banditry, communal violence). Graduates sometimes report little protection or poor communication about risk. Parents and corps members worry about safety. -
Financial Burden and Low Allowances
The monthly allowance (stipend) is modest (approx. ₦33,000 at the time of writing) and often delayed. Given rising inflation, cost of living, transportation, and food prices, this sum barely covers basic needs. Many corps members must rely on family support, defeating part of the scheme’s goal to foster independence. -
Exploitation and Poor Skill Acquisition
In many Primary Place(s) of Assignment (PPAs), corps members report being used as free labor rather than being given roles that enhance professional skills or learning. Sometimes tasks are menial, unrelated to one’s field of study, or supervisors do not provide mentorship. That diminishes the professional value of the service year. -
Emotional & Physical Strain
Being posted far from home can strain mental health; living conditions may be poor; transport and logistical difficulties often add up. Some corps members feel isolated or suffer from lack of adequate support (medical, mental health, housing). -
Opportunity Cost
Graduates spend one full year in compulsory service. During this time, opportunities elsewhere (jobs, internships, further education) might pass them by. For those who have to pay fees, or who could be earning elsewhere, the cost of waiting can be high.
Real-World Examples & Anecdotes
(While detailed quantitative data is limited in this article, these qualitative stories reflect lived experiences.)
-
A graduate in a high-risk state narrates how they had to hire their own private transportation at extra cost to avoid unsafe travel routes.
-
Multiple corps members in PPAs report that they are assigned tasks completely unrelated to their academic discipline—e.g. graduates in education or engineering getting clerical, administrative, or manual tasks—with little supervision.
-
Delays in allowances cause corps members to pay out-of-pocket for essentials like food, transport, and sometimes accommodation.
Cost-Benefit Summary Table
| Benefit | Cost / Risk |
|---|---|
| National unity & cultural exposure | Personal safety risks in insecure locations |
| Access to job-eligibility through NYSC certificate | Meager allowance; delays imposes financial strain |
| Soft skills: independence, resilience | Exploitation / irrelevant work assignments |
| Social legitimacy and networking | Emotional, physical, and opportunity costs |
| Gateway to government and private job eligibility | Costs in transport, housing, daily living, sometimes family support needed |
Should NYSC Be Scrapped? The Arguments Against Abolition
Some critics argue that NYSC has outlived its usefulness and should be completely discontinued. Their arguments include:
-
Requirement is bureaucratic and rigid: In many cases, having the NYSC certificate is more about ticking a requirement box than reflecting actual competence or contribution.
-
Cost vs Benefit Imbalance: For many graduates, the time, risks, and expenses far exceed what they gain during the service year.
-
Systemic Flaws: Inadequate safety, lack of quality PPAs, delays in payment, corruption or inefficiency in posting or implementation.
However, scrapping NYSC entirely also entails risks:
-
If abolished, graduates might lose a key credential needed for certain jobs.
-
Abolition could weaken the sense of national integration.
-
The symbolic value of NYSC — as a unifier and rite of passage — might erode national identity frameworks.
What “Radical Reform” Needs to Look Like
Rather than discarding NYSC, many analysts propose reform. Possible reforms include:
-
Security-Sensitive Posting
Implement a posting policy that avoids high-risk areas unless adequate protection is in place. Corps members and their families should have access to risk maps, security briefings, and protective infrastructure. -
Living Wage Allowance
Adjust the monthly allowance upward, benchmarked against local cost of living and inflation. Also ensure timely payments. -
Transparent & Fair Posting System
Use data-driven, merit-and-safety criteria to assign postings. Allow corps members some choice where possible. Ensure delays and favoritism are minimized. -
Meaningful Skill Acquistion
Mandate that PPAs provide training, mentorship, relevant duties, and exposure in line with corps members’ fields of study. Possibly rotate corps members through multiple roles. -
Support Services
Provide mental health support; ensure housing and accommodation standards are met; establish grievance mechanisms; ensure medical access. -
Periodic Evaluation & Accountability
Release regular data and reports on the performance of NYSC: number of corps members posted in risky zones, delays in allowances, levels of satisfaction, employment outcomes post-NYSC. Hold administrators accountable for inefficiencies or rights abuses.
Verdict: Reform, Not Abolition
On balance, while NYSC suffers from serious problems, complete scrapping would remove both its formal and informal benefits. For most graduates, reform provides the better path ahead. If properly restructured, NYSC can continue to serve its original purposes in a way that respects the dignity, safety, and ambitions of graduates.
What Graduates Can Do While Reform Happens
In the meantime, here are steps graduates can take to mitigate the risks and get the most out of NYSC:
-
Before accepting PPA assignments, try to gather information about the location’s safety, accommodation, and mentorship possibilities.
-
Build networks during service year; sometimes networking in PPAs can offset weaknesses in formal skill acquisition.
-
Use the time to learn soft skills: leadership, communication, adaptability, initiative—skills that matter to employers.
-
Advocate: engage student unions, NYSC officials, civil society, to push for better policies, transparency, and reform.
-
Plan financially: save ahead, budget for delays, try to have family support or side-income where possible.
Conclusion
The NYSC scheme remains one of Nigeria’s most enduring national programs. Its ideals—unity, civic service, national exposure—continue to matter. Yet, in 2024, too many graduates find that the execution of those ideals fails: insecurity, exploitation, inadequate remuneration, and opportunity cost weigh heavily.
Scrapping NYSC might seem tempting to some, but doing so without considering what is lost risks creating new problems—loss of structure, credential gaps, and weakening of national unity. What is needed most is bold, honest reform: safety first; fair compensation; meaningful work; and transparency. Only then can NYSC fulfill its promise to Nigerian graduates in the modern era.